WOM vs. Digital PR (#mcl2)
Tweet
Barcamps are great to exchange ideas with fellow professionals you would never otherwise met. Around 40 marketing professionals braved the rain to attend Media Camp London #2 last Saturday. The interesting Twitter chatter that took place on the day can be found right here.
One of the sessions I took part in, led me to think about the differences between WOM and digital PR, and this post attempts to identify the subtle nuances between both disciplines.
WOM, is a reference to the passing of information from person to person. Word of mouth marketing which emcompasses a variety of sub-categories, including buzz, blog, viral, grassroots, cause influencers and social media marketing, as well as ambassador programmes, work with consumer generated media and more.
Source: Wikipedia
WOM Marketing campaigns tend to include the biggies; influencer marketing i.e. blogs integrated with Twitter, Flickr, FriendFeed and sometimes social networks such as Facebook which all play a distinctive role as part of an integrated social media campaign.
The aim of WOM marketing to influence the online decision-making process and ultimately lead to purchase.
Assume I am in the market for a new Skypephone – as an Internet addict, I would probably use resources such as 3mobilebuzz to find out about the the service and mobile phone reviews. Reading about people’s experiences about a mobile phone or a provider is likely to influence my decision.
WOM Marketing is therefore a long-term effort that aims to create a community of brand ambassadors, who are promoting a brand and influencing other consumers with their reviews.
I see Digital PR, on the other hand, as a short-term strategic effort.
Digital public relations, or interactive PR, is the use of Internet tools and technologies such as search engines, Web 2.0 social bookmarking, new media relations, blogging and social media marketing. Interactive PR allows companies and organizations to disseminate information without relying solely on mainstream publications and communicate directly with the public, customers and prospects.
Source: Wikipedia
Digital PR is well -suited – probably more so than advertising – to handle whatever programs a company or brand launches in the Web 2.0 space; PR practitioners are well-versed in managing conversations.
Digital PR practitioners can be compared to brand image consultants - they interact with influencers and online communities, listen to consumers and respond to them.
In terms of execution, Digital PR campaigns tend to place greater emphasis on social networks such as Facebook, MySpace or Bebo. Engaging communities via social networks is much harder than engaging bloggers who are constantly active online which is the reason why I see digital PR a short-term strategic effort.
What are your thoughts on this? I’d really love to generate a debate on the topic
| Print article | This entry was posted by Lolly on 19/12/2008 at 4:36 pm, and is filed under Digital PR Tips. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |







about 3 years ago
I think I would rather look at the type of a message WOM Marketing and PR strive to achieve. PR is aiming to convince consumers to buy, try out, meet the brand. WOM Marketing is providing the bridge between brand and consumers to discuss the product. PR aims to present brand and products in good and impressive lights. WOM Marketing cannot – brands need to be prepared for true, honest opinion – not always positive.
Both PR and WOM Marketing face challenges in social media era – PR needs to rethink their approach, WOM Marketing needs to explain it to the clients – it’s difficult to be transparent and ready to face the consumer, to listen to them…
I am interested to see how PR and WOM Marketing will work together to learn from each other.
about 3 years ago
Interesting point, never really thought about it honestly. Don’t you think that Viral marketing might be more suitable for small company/start up that needs to grow fast and to reach lots fo people whereas PR is aimed at continuous short term campaign for a highly targeted number of people??
about 3 years ago
interesting post and wish I had been – next time I have to go.
Really I see one as a sub-set of the other. Digital PR is surely an overall programme, of which WOM is one element
about 3 years ago
An Account Director i work with came out with ‘Word of Mouse’ the other day – the premise being that it’s WOM gone digital.
I think that the two are related, but not by blood; as Dirk Singer said WOM is one element of Digital PR, but i’d add that ‘Word of Mouse’ is a link between the two.
about 3 years ago
Great topic for discussion, and I think it’s one of a related set of discussions that are influencing the direction of the traditional PR world. I’m glad that you related it briefly to the difference between advertising and PR.
Personally, I use many of the tools you mention but not all, which may indicate yet a third category. But, I don’t think a third category is necessary any more than I think putting a name on the other two categories adequately describes the work we all do.
The challenge that I see is for the PR world to adequately lay claim to its place at the table as advertising is looking for common ground to recoup budget losses.
about 3 years ago
Thanks to the author! Subscribe to the newsletter. Continue to write in that direction.